Preparing for the Future: Navigating the EU Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence Directive CSDDD

10 mins

Sustainability

August 19, 2024

CSDDD Hero Image Covelent Management Consulting

The European Union's adoption of the Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence Directive (CSDDD) introduces mandatory due diligence obligations for large companies, significantly impacting supply chain management and operational risks.

In a significant move towards sustainable business practices, the European Union has formally adopted the Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence Directive (CSDDD). This directive, which was published in the EU Official Journal on 5 July 2024, introduces mandatory due diligence obligations for large companies operating within the EU, with far-reaching implications for how businesses manage their supply chains and operational risks. As companies prepare to navigate these new requirements, there is a clear need for strategic planning and effective implementation to ensure compliance and sustainability.

What are the CSDDD's Objectives?

At the core of the CSDDD is the directive’s aim to embed sustainability into the DNA of businesses operating in the EU. The directive requires companies to take proactive steps to identify, mitigate, and manage human rights and environmental risks across their operations and supply chains. The CSDDD signals a shift from voluntary sustainability efforts to a legally binding framework that holds companies accountable for the broader impacts of their activities.

For management teams, this directive is not just a legal challenge but a strategic one. Implementing robust due diligence processes will be critical not only for compliance but also for maintaining competitiveness in an increasingly sustainability-conscious market.

Harmonisation with Broader Regulatory Frameworks

While the CSDDD sets out new standards, it is part of a broader ecosystem of EU regulations aimed at promoting sustainable business practices. This includes existing laws like the Conflict Minerals Regulation and the Batteries Regulation, which already impose specific due diligence requirements. The CSDDD builds on these frameworks, ensuring that due diligence is applied consistently across all sectors and aligning with overarching EU sustainability goals.

For companies, the challenge will be to integrate these various regulatory requirements into a cohesive due diligence strategy that not only meets legal obligations but also supports long-term business goals. This requires a deep understanding of both the regulatory landscape and the operational realities of implementing such processes across complex, global supply chains.

Identifying Which Companies Are Affected

The scope of the CSDDD is broad, targeting large companies that meet certain thresholds in terms of employee numbers and turnover. This includes both EU-based companies and non-EU companies with significant operations within the EU. As these companies prepare for compliance, a critical first step is understanding whether they fall within the directive’s scope and assessing how their business activities align with the new requirements.

This phase involves a detailed analysis of corporate structures and operational footprints, which can be complex, especially for multinational organisations.

Phased Implementation: A Strategic Opportunity

The CSDDD’s phased implementation schedule offers companies the opportunity to approach compliance in a structured manner. Rather than viewing this as merely a regulatory burden, companies can use the staggered deadlines as a chance to develop and refine their due diligence processes incrementally. This approach not only facilitates smoother integration of new practices but also allows for the alignment of these processes with broader strategic initiatives.

Key Steps in Implementing Due Diligence Processes

To comply with the CSDDD, companies must embed due diligence into their core operations. This involves several key steps:

Risk Identification and Assessment: Companies need to conduct thorough assessments of their operations, supply chains, and business relationships to identify areas where human rights or environmental risks may arise. This step is critical in setting the foundation for effective due diligence.
Integration into Business Practices: Once risks are identified, companies must integrate due diligence into their policies, processes, and decision-making frameworks. This may involve revising existing protocols, implementing new monitoring systems, and ensuring that due diligence is considered at every level of the organisation.
Mitigation and Remediation: Companies are required to take measures to prevent, mitigate, and where necessary, remediate any adverse impacts identified. This could include modifying business operations, engaging with suppliers to improve practices, or providing compensation and support to affected communities.
Stakeholder Engagement: Effective due diligence requires ongoing engagement with stakeholders, including employees, suppliers, customers, and communities. Companies must establish mechanisms for meaningful dialogue and ensure that stakeholder concerns are addressed in their due diligence processes.
Monitoring and Reporting: Continuous monitoring of due diligence efforts is essential to ensure that processes remain effective. Companies must also be prepared to report on their due diligence activities, providing transparency and accountability to regulators, investors, and the public.

The Strategic Role of Climate Transition Plans

Beyond traditional due diligence, the CSDDD places a strong emphasis on climate change mitigation. Companies are required to develop and implement climate transition plans that align their business strategies with the goals of the Paris Agreement. These plans should include specific targets, timelines, and actions that demonstrate a commitment to reducing carbon emissions and transitioning to a more sustainable business model.

Navigating the Consequences of Non-Compliance

While the CSDDD introduces significant obligations, it also comes with stringent enforcement mechanisms. Non-compliance can result in substantial penalties, including fines based on a percentage of the company’s global turnover, and potential civil liabilities. Additionally, failure to comply with the directive could affect a company’s ability to participate in public procurement and other market opportunities.

Given the high stakes, it is essential for companies to approach compliance strategically. This involves not only meeting the letter of the law but also building robust systems and processes that support long-term sustainability goals.